TOP has a lot of readers in the UK, so each time I write one of my OT posts on pool, a few people will politely request that I give snooker a try. Snooker (the "oo" is pronounced like "blue" or "flew," not like "look" or "book") seems a characteristically British sport, in that at first glance it seems a bit worked-up, a touch daft, with lots of oddities and contrivances; brought to you by the culture that thought "thirty-love" was a fine enough way of saying "two points to none." So in the past week I studied the rules of snooker, learned the basics of how it's played and scored, and watched several matches online.
In other words, I still know nothing at all about it. But I know a lot more than I did before.
Surprise: it's a better game than pool. It strikes me as a more just test of the relative skill and merits of two opponents. For all its contrivances, it has some of the same subtlety, the delicate balances, the "just-rightness," of baseball. It gets rid of the big problem of 9-ball and 10-ball, namely the luck of the break, by starting every frame off with what amounts to a safety battle. It requires mastery of most cue-sport skills, and requires tactical thinking. It seems capable of rewarding both patience and boldness at different times. A fine game to watch at the tournament level. If it's not as exciting as pool, it seems like it can be just as entertaining.
I confess that I get a little frustrated with the arbitrary quality of pool games (although I have a soft spot for one-pocket). Nine ball in particular seems to put too much weight on how the breaking player falls on the lowest numbered ball. Frustration with the natural shortcomings in the design of the games was what led, most recently, to the development of American Rotation.
I will say that snooker fans' superiority complex over its difficulty isn't very justified. Yes, the balls and the pockets are smaller, but when snooker players are actually pocketing balls they're essentially playing on a table that's 6x6'. The other end of the table is mainly used for safety play. So all you snooker fans should stop patting yourselves on the back over how easy pool supposedly is by comparison. Until you start playing 10-ball on snooker tables.
At the same time, it's true that the occasional long ball is another aspect of the variety that snooker offers. It's a nice mix of skills the game requires.
Pure speculation
I like snooker enough that I have to wonder why it isn't less popular. I'm going to venture what Ctein calls a WAG—a wild-ass guess—and wonder whether snooker's popularity might have been on the increase in the last couple of decades? The reason I ask is that this guy Ronnie O'Sullivan has the feel of a genuine phenomenon—when he's "on," watching him can make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. I'm wondering if perhaps he isn't a sort of Michael Jordan, one of those athletes whose brilliance raises the stature and popularity of his whole sport. Willie Mosconi did that for what was then called straight pool—he was such a huge draw, and commanded so much respect, that the whole game suffered a blow when he retired. In a sense straight pool (14-1) never completely recovered. Basketball was in the doldrums for a while after Michael Jordan got old and went away—attendance went down and basketball lost some of the cultural importance, the centrality it had enjoyed when he was playing. I really have no basis for saying this—it's purely a feeling—but I'd bet that some of snooker's popularity is due to the presence of such a defining player, and that its popularity in the places where it's popular could go a bit on the wane once O'Sullivan's career is done.
Perhaps I'm being ridiculous, though. As I say, just a WAG based on intuition.
Whatever. I like snooker; I'll be watching more of it. The fact that the sport as a whole seems a lot healthier than pool (or than pool here, at any rate) is a pleasant bonus. The dread, anomie, and demoralization in American pool is so thick you can cut it with a knife sometimes—which can get tiresome. Snooker might seem a little odd to Americans, but I think our UK friends are on to something where cue sports are concerned.
Mike
(Photo by DerHexer, Wikimedia Commons, CC-by-sa 4.0)
("Open Mike" is the Editor's weekly Sunday indulgence. And some people actually like reading these.)
Original contents copyright 2015 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site.
(To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below.)
Featured Comments from:
No featured comments yet—please check back soon!
